Einstein.us | Einstein.us

Smart Forensics by AVM Technology!

This page will contain articles about computer forensics and information security. The articles will be created by the Virginia computer forensics trial experts at AVM Technology, LLC and by Domingo J Rivera. We will also accept submissions by other thought leads in the fields of computer forensics and information security. Stay tuned for articles, tips, and advice for doing forensics the smart way!

Latest stories

Malibu Media v Doe - Copyright Subpoena

Mon, Mar 18, 2019

This is one of the cases involving the Malibu Media efforts to identify a "John Doe" defendant. In this case, the Court granted the subpoena to identify the potential defendant - By: Domingo J. Rivera

Another Breach of Note - UConn Health

Thu, Mar 14, 2019

UConn self-reported that an unauthorized third party got access to some employee email accounts. The information obtained included Social Security numbers, birthdays, billing details and medical appointments. The breach affected as many as 326,000 individuals, and 1,500 of them may have involved Social Security numbers. It was also revealed that the source of the breach was a phishing attack but the perpetrator is still unidentified.

Sarkar v. Doe The University of Mississippi Case

Fri, Mar 8, 2019

This case involves a claim by a professor of pathology involving Internet defamation, which he claims cost him his employment at the University of Mississippi. The University cited some anonymous posts in an online forum as a reason for terminating Dr. Sarkar employment resulting in a lawsuit and a quest to uncover the identity of the anonymous posters. The case made its way to the Court of Appeals of Michigan. The Court"s opinion follows. Domingo J. Rivera

John Doe Motion To Quash Subpoena - The USAR Defamation Case

Wed, Mar 6, 2019

This case involves an appeal to an Order denying a Motion to Quash a subpoena. The purpose of the subpoena was to unmask the identity of the individual posting accusations regarding alleged securities fraud by USAR. The opinion follows.